Yue Chim Richard Wong 王于漸

Corporate Social Responsibility: Meeting Social Needs in Hong Kong

By YueChim Richard On 2011/06/10 · Add Comment · 74,237 views

. . . . . Peter Drucker’s observation that there is now no developed country where people still expect government programs to succeed. He gave four reasons why such government programs have failed everywhere. One reason is that governments are doing too many things to be able to do any one thing successfully . . . . .

[Continue Reading...]

Corporate Social Responsibility from the Perspective of Underdevelopment in the Middle East

By YueChim Richard On 2011/06/03 · Add Comment · 3,744 views

. . . From the very start Islam did not discourage commerce. . . . Its businessmen dominated several of the world’s major long-distance trade routes. Islam spread to the Far East and Africa not through the sword but primarily through trade. . . . Islamic commercial institutions dominated all these areas. But these institutions remained stagnant for centuries and the modern profit-making corporation failed to emerge from within Islam. It had to be belatedly transplanted from the West.

[Continue Reading...]

What is Corporate Social Responsibility? – Three Stakeholder Views

By YueChim Richard On 2011/05/27 · 1 Comment · 23,094 views

. . . in a modern economy the main source of capital formation is business profit. Without these profits it is impossible to finance these social needs. The taxing of these profits by government and relying on public provision to solve these social needs have proven unsuccessful. For this reason Drucker differs from the shareholders view of CSR. He supports the Third Sector rather than pinning his hopes on the public sector.

[Continue Reading...]

What is Corporate Social Responsibility – Do We Need It? And Why?

By YueChim Richard On 2011/05/20 · Add Comment · 11,924 views

For Friedman the CSR doctrine, taken seriously, would extend the scope of the political mechanism to every human activity. It does not differ in philosophy from the most explicitly collectivist doctrine. It differs only by professing to believe that collectivist ends can be attained without collectivist means. That is why Friedman called it a "fundamentally subversive doctrine" in a free society.

[Continue Reading...]

Languages

Announcements 通告

Social Network 社交網絡

Recent Comments